Difference between revisions of "Category talk:Complex data visualization"

From TransitWiki
Jump to: navigation, search
(response RE: subcategorization)
Line 1: Line 1:
 +
===Sub-categorization===
 
I don't think that this should be categorized under [[:Category:GTFS-consuming applications]] --[[User:Aaronantrim|Aaronantrim]] ([[User talk:Aaronantrim|talk]]) 22:49, 3 February 2017 (MST)
 
I don't think that this should be categorized under [[:Category:GTFS-consuming applications]] --[[User:Aaronantrim|Aaronantrim]] ([[User talk:Aaronantrim|talk]]) 22:49, 3 February 2017 (MST)
 
:What guidelines should we establish for when something qualifies as a subcategory of [[:Category:GTFS-consuming applications]] and when it is too separate to qualify? -- [[User:Leeor|Leeor]] ([[User talk:Leeor|talk]]) 20:47, 4 February 2017 (MST)
 
:What guidelines should we establish for when something qualifies as a subcategory of [[:Category:GTFS-consuming applications]] and when it is too separate to qualify? -- [[User:Leeor|Leeor]] ([[User talk:Leeor|talk]]) 20:47, 4 February 2017 (MST)
 +
:Articles can be filed under multiple categories. My thinking is that some/many data visualization applications might well not be GTFS-consuming. --[[User:Aaronantrim|Aaronantrim]] ([[User talk:Aaronantrim|talk]]) 14:19, 5 February 2017 (MST)

Revision as of 21:19, 5 February 2017

Sub-categorization

I don't think that this should be categorized under Category:GTFS-consuming applications --Aaronantrim (talk) 22:49, 3 February 2017 (MST)

What guidelines should we establish for when something qualifies as a subcategory of Category:GTFS-consuming applications and when it is too separate to qualify? -- Leeor (talk) 20:47, 4 February 2017 (MST)
Articles can be filed under multiple categories. My thinking is that some/many data visualization applications might well not be GTFS-consuming. --Aaronantrim (talk) 14:19, 5 February 2017 (MST)