Difference between revisions of "Out-of-vehicle experience"

From TransitWiki
Jump to: navigation, search
(Background)
Line 1: Line 1:
==Background==
+
==Introduction==
 +
 
 +
[[File:Portland Bus Stop.jpg|thumb|right|300px|This bus stop in Portland, Ore., provides amenities like shelter. Photo by Flickr user Jason McHuff.]]
 +
 
 +
 
 
Certain low cost strategies, such as real-time arrival and routing information, attractive waiting areas, universal fare media, marketing/perception influence, and other low-cost measures can cost-effectively increase ridership by improving the transit experience.
 
Certain low cost strategies, such as real-time arrival and routing information, attractive waiting areas, universal fare media, marketing/perception influence, and other low-cost measures can cost-effectively increase ridership by improving the transit experience.
  

Revision as of 00:11, 8 March 2012

Introduction

This bus stop in Portland, Ore., provides amenities like shelter. Photo by Flickr user Jason McHuff.


Certain low cost strategies, such as real-time arrival and routing information, attractive waiting areas, universal fare media, marketing/perception influence, and other low-cost measures can cost-effectively increase ridership by improving the transit experience.

The out-of-vehicle waiting experience plays a critical role in an individual’s willingness to use transit for their traveling needs. A pleasant walk to and wait at a transit stop can add value to the transit experience, while time spent in a dirty, loud or unsafe environment is perceived to be much more costly that time spent in-vehicle.

Strategies

Real-time arrival and routing information

Attractive and more secure waiting areas

Improvement to the quality of pedestrian network