Difference between revisions of "Category talk:Complex data visualization"
Jump to navigation
Jump to search
Aaronantrim (talk | contribs) (response RE: subcategorization) |
|||
| Line 1: | Line 1: | ||
| + | ===Sub-categorization=== | ||
I don't think that this should be categorized under [[:Category:GTFS-consuming applications]] --[[User:Aaronantrim|Aaronantrim]] ([[User talk:Aaronantrim|talk]]) 22:49, 3 February 2017 (MST) | I don't think that this should be categorized under [[:Category:GTFS-consuming applications]] --[[User:Aaronantrim|Aaronantrim]] ([[User talk:Aaronantrim|talk]]) 22:49, 3 February 2017 (MST) | ||
:What guidelines should we establish for when something qualifies as a subcategory of [[:Category:GTFS-consuming applications]] and when it is too separate to qualify? -- [[User:Leeor|Leeor]] ([[User talk:Leeor|talk]]) 20:47, 4 February 2017 (MST) | :What guidelines should we establish for when something qualifies as a subcategory of [[:Category:GTFS-consuming applications]] and when it is too separate to qualify? -- [[User:Leeor|Leeor]] ([[User talk:Leeor|talk]]) 20:47, 4 February 2017 (MST) | ||
| + | :Articles can be filed under multiple categories. My thinking is that some/many data visualization applications might well not be GTFS-consuming. --[[User:Aaronantrim|Aaronantrim]] ([[User talk:Aaronantrim|talk]]) 14:19, 5 February 2017 (MST) | ||
Revision as of 21:19, 5 February 2017
Sub-categorization
I don't think that this should be categorized under Category:GTFS-consuming applications --Aaronantrim (talk) 22:49, 3 February 2017 (MST)
- What guidelines should we establish for when something qualifies as a subcategory of Category:GTFS-consuming applications and when it is too separate to qualify? -- Leeor (talk) 20:47, 4 February 2017 (MST)
- Articles can be filed under multiple categories. My thinking is that some/many data visualization applications might well not be GTFS-consuming. --Aaronantrim (talk) 14:19, 5 February 2017 (MST)