Changes

Jump to: navigation, search

Automated fare media

230 bytes added, 05:34, 18 January 2018
no edit summary
[[File:Clipper_card.jpg|thumb|right|300px|The Clipper Card is an automated fare medium used in the San Francisco Bay Area by seven of the region's transit agencies, including Bay Area Rapid Transit (BART). Photo by Flickr user sam_churchill.]] [[Category:Reduce dwell timeBus rapid transit]][[Category:Coordination between agenciesTechnology]] 
==Introduction==
Transit agencies have traditionally used cash-based fare systems, but cash is expensive to transport, count, and guard. It can also be inconvenient for riders to have to pay an exact fare for each leg of a trip. For these reasons, many agencies have introduced automated fare media by expanding fare payment to electronic, magnetic-stripe contact cards and more recently to smartcards.
[[File:Clipper_card.jpg|thumb|right|300px|The Clipper Card A smartcard is a contactless, reusable, prepaid card that includes an automated embedded microchip to monitor fare medium used in the San Francisco Bay Area by seven of the region's transit agencies, including Bay Area Rapid Transit transactions and stored balance. Payment is processed through a microchip using [[near field communications]] or [[radio frequency identification (BARTRFID)]]. Photo by Flickr user sam_churchillTransit agencies view smartcards as a potentially revolutionary advancement due to their benefits, which include convenience, greater fare flexibility, operational cost savings, service enhancements, decreased fare-processing time, centralized fare collection, more efficient fare pricing, and greater capacity for data compilation of ridership and travel behavior.]]
Transit agencies traditionally used cash fare systems, but cash is expensive to transport, count, and guardSeveral U. It can also be inconvenient for riders to have to pay an exact fare for each leg of a tripS. For these reasons, many transit agencies have introduced automated fare media by expanding fare payment to electronicalso deployed mobile ticketing solutions. They include TriMet (Portland), magnetic stripe contact cards and more recently to smart cards. A smart card is a contactlessSan Diego, reusableBoston, prepaid card that includes an embedded microchip to monitor fare transactions and stored balanceDallas. Payment is processed through the microchip using [[near field communications]]. Transit agencies view smart cards as a potentially revolutionary advancement due to Riders can install applications on their benefits, which include convenience, greater fare flexibility, operational cost savings, service enhancements, decreased fare processing time, centralized fare collection, more efficient fare pricing, and greater capacity for data compilation of ridership and travel behaviorsmartphones.
==Types of Systems==
Automated fare media can come in a variety of formats and can even include credit and debit cards. One key point to remember is that there are two types of systems: open and closed. Open systems accept payment through fare media issued by an entity outside of the transit system, such as a bank or a university. Closed systems only accept payment forms only issued by that system.
Transit -system management of fare collection can be a costly endeavor and there may be some advantages to outside management of the fare -payment system. However, with credit and debit cards, some of the advantages of prepayment will be lost.<refname="tcrp32">Transit Cooperative Research Project. [http://www.trb.org/main/blurbs/153815.aspx “Report 32: Multipurpose Fleishman, D., Schweiger, C., Lott, D., & Pierlott, G. (1998). “Multipurpose Transit Payment Media.” 1998Transit Cooperative Research Program.]</ref>
== Interagency coordination ==
==Reducing vehicle dwell time==
An automated Automated fare media can reduce or eliminate the need for transit customers to pay in cash, a typically time-intensive process compared to electronic fare media. Many electronic fare media in use feature the ability to pre-load the fare card with passes or cash value.
The Federal Transit Administration notes:
Many transit agencies offer prepaid fare media, such as a season pass, stored value card, or ticket. If a driver is required to inspect passes, boarding can be longer than with payment in change. An electronic fare box with a card reader can reduce boarding time for pass holders.
Fare cards with a microchip, or smart cards, can allow transit agencies to offer a more sophisticated fare policy. Contactless smart cards need only be waved at a marked spot, and therefore can reduce payment time.<ref>Federal Transit Administration. [http://www.fta.dot.gov/12351_4362.html|"Fare Collection."Federal Transit Administration.]</ref></blockquote>
==Resistance to use of smart cards==
There are many reasons why riders would choose to use cash for fare payment rather than smart cards smartcards or other prepaid fare payment. They Reasons include the perception that the initial cost of obtaining the card will not be worth the investment, the fear of losing a pre-paid card’s value, concerns about [[Privacy Issues|privacyissues]], and the convenience of cash for the occasional rider.<ref>Transit Cooperative Research Project. [http:name="tcrp32" //www.trb.org/main/blurbs/153815.aspx “Report 32: Multipurpose Transit Payment Media.” 1998.]</ref>
==References==
<references/>
==Additional Reading==
[http://www.its.berkeley.edu/sites/default/files/publications/UCB/2008/PRR/UCB-ITS-PRR-2008-14.pdf Iseki, HiroyukiH., Alexander DemischA., Brian Taylor, B.D. Taylor, and Allison & Yoh, A.C. Yoh(2008). [[media:Evaluating_Smart_Cards.pdf|“Evaluating the Costs and Benefits of Transit Smart Cards.”. California PATH Program, UC Berkeley.]] 2008.: This study examines the cost-benefit analysis strategies of three transit agencies prior to implementation of smart card systems for fare payment. It was produced through the University of California's PATH program, in cooperation with the State of California Business, Transportation, and Housing Agency, the California Department of Transportation, and the United States Department of Transportation, Federal Highway Administration. The systems studied are the Metropolitan Transportation Commission (MTC) in the San Francisco Bay Area, the Los Angeles Country Metropolitan Transportation Authority (Metro), and the Southeastern Pennsylvania Transportation Authority (SEPTA).
[http://ntl.bts.gov/lib/jpodocs/repts_te/13479.html Federal Highway Administration. (2001). "Ventura County Fare Integration: A Case Study; Promoting Seamless Regional Fare Coordination."]
: This report by the Federal Highway Administration is a case study of Ventura County, California's transition to using several Intelligent Transportation Systems, including contactless fare cards, or smart cards. The report includes a description of the lessons learned from this multi-jurisdictional transition. Most importantly, the report outlines the institutional needs, the technical requirements, the methods for gaining customer acceptance, and lessons learned to make the program more successful.
Federal Highway Administration. [http[media://ntlElectronicFareCollectionOptionsforCommuterRailroads.btspdf| Rainville, L.gov/lib/jpodocs/repts_te/13479, Hsu, V.html "Ventura County , & Peirce, S. (2009). “Electronic Fare Integration: A Case Study; Promoting Seamless Regional Fare CoordinationCollection Options for Commuter Railroads.” Federal Transit Administration."] 2001.]: This report by 2009 study from the Federal Highway Transit Administration is a case study describes the experiences of Ventura County, California's transition to six commuter railroad systems that have begun using several [Intelligent Transportation Systems]automated fare media, including 'contact' and 'contactless ' fare cards, or smart cards. The report includes a description of the lessons Case studies include San Diego's Coaster commuter rail line. Lessons learned from this multi-jurisdictional transition. Most importantly, the report outlines the institutional needs, the technical requirements, the methods for gaining customer acceptance, as well as the things the agencies involved could have done differently are specifically tailored to make the program more successfulcommuter rail systems.
Bureaucrats, emailconfirmed, engaged
22
edits

Navigation menu